CATEGORIES
- (44)Accounting & Financial Reporting
- (1)Accounting for Income Tax
- (1)Application of tax rates, s6(2) rebates
- (1)Assessed losses
- (10)Blogs
- (1)Business Advisory
- (8)Capital Gains Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax - Individuals Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax Implications of Trusts
- (2)Case study: Home office expense
- (1)Case study: Travel allowances
- (1)Company Formations
- (136)Corporate Tax
- (10)Customs and Excise
- (2)Deceased Estate
- (1)Deductions Pre-trade and prepaid expenses
- (1)Deregistration
- (2)Employer and Employee (PAYE and UIF Specific)
- (1)Estate Duty
- (1)Events / Webinars
- (11)Faculty News
- (2)Farming
- (166)Individuals Tax
- (1)Input - Customs Duty
- (3)Interest
- (18)International Tax
- (1)Nature of the rights of beneficiaries
- (1)Notional input tax
- (9)Payroll
- (2)Practical Payroll
- (2)Provisional tax (Link with other Taxes)
- (4)SARS Issues
- (1)Salaried Employees
- (156)Tax Administration
- (2)Tax Administration Part 2B: Resolving Problems with SARS using the Tax Ombud
- (1)Tax Administration Part 3B Dispute Resolution - Objection and appeal
- (3)Tax Dispute Resolution
- (1)Tax Opinions
- (3)Tax Update
- (1)Tax implications of loans to trusts
- (1)Tax residence
- (1)Tax returns and payments
- (3)Transfer-Pricing
- (1)Trust Income / Gain Allocations
- (1)Trust types and income allocations
- (10)Trusts
- (84)VAT
- (3)VAT periods
- (1)Wear and tear allowances
- (13)Wills, Estates & Succession
- (1)Zero Rated
- (2)eFiling
- Show All
Incorrect IRP5 Certificate
- 25 July 2024
- Tax Administration
- The Tax Faculty Tax Specialist
These articles are based on tax law for the year ending 28 February 2025.
1. Background
For the 2023 year of assessment, a client received total remuneration of R3,036,765, from which PAYE of R1,222,789.93 was withheld. However, the IRP5 issued by the client's former employer incorrectly reflected only R1,205,452 in remuneration and R482,944.75 in PAYE withheld. Despite multiple attempts over several months to have the IRP5 corrected, the employer has refused to rectify the discrepancy and instead directed the client to resolve the matter with SARS. This refusal has resulted in administrative non-compliance penalties amounting to over R12,000 due to the non-submission of the client's tax return.
2. The Problem / Facts
How can a taxpayer resolve an issue where their employer issued an incorrect IRP5 certificate and refuses to correct it, resulting in potential penalties and suspected fraud?
3. Applicable Law
TAA 28 of 2011, section 95(3)
4. Application of the Law to the Facts
It is evident that the taxpayer cannot submit an accurate return due to an incorrect IRP5; therefore, he needs to reach an agreement with SARS to issue an estimated assessment in terms of section 95(3) based on the evidence provided. The burden of proof always resides with the taxpayer, and it is suggested that the following actions be taken:
Report the Matter to the Police:
Alleging fraud. The case number is important as evidence in the submission to SARS.
Approach the CCMA:
- File a complaint that the employer has not fulfilled their obligation towards the employee in terms of the employer/employee relationship.
- Request the CCMA to grant an order compelling the employer to issue the corrected IRP5.
These actions can support the taxpayer in affirming that he is doing everything reasonable to comply with his obligations toward SARS.
Engagement with SARS:
The taxpayer should engage with SARS to issue an estimated assessment in accordance with the evidence presented. The following documents can be presented as evidence to support the taxpayer’s request:
- All payslips issued by the employer for the year of assessment in question.
- Bank statements showing the movement of salary into the taxpayer’s account from the employer, and if applicable, a copy of the service contract.
- Name and contact details of the employer.
- Physical address of the employer.
- Documents confirming the request to the employer to issue the corrected IRP5 and the employer's reply (if available).
- Affidavits filed with the police, including case numbers, and any CCMA confirmation of a complaint.
Past Experience
It has been reported by tax practitioners that when the taxpayer goes to the SARS branch with as much evidence as possible, they have had success in having SARS issue an assessment considering the correct PAYE. If visiting the branch is not possible, book a telephone appointment and upload all the evidence along with a cover letter explaining why the taxpayer’s circumstances require SARS to issue an estimated assessment based on the evidence provided.